Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Building the Conservative Canon

Glad my first post on the subject generated some interest. I really didn't have anything else planned for this week. The Democrat primary doesn't interest me in the least. (Who's going to win, the liberal Senator or the most liberal Senator?)

The POTUS race still has a lot of time to play out and who wants to get burned out before the snow melts?

So, continuing the discussion of the previous post, let's answer a few questions:

Which P.J. O'Rourke book do we go with? "Parliament of Whores" is generally considered his most important book, "Eat the Rich" is a valuable tool for understanding economics, "Republican Party Reptile" is very popular, "All the Trouble in the World" is a classic in my mind; "Holidays in Hell" and "Age and Guile" have their attractions as well.

My vote is "Parliament of Whores" and "Eat the Rich." I don't want to give any author more than 3 books on the canon so those are the constraints we have to deal with.

We should also create categories to help us organize the canon.

Here are some I came up with:

Political Technology (practical politics, how to win elections, etc)
Family Values
The Law
History
Liberty
Economics
Education
Faith
Tyranny
Literature
Conservation (environment)
People (i'm a huge believer in biographies and I think the movement has been shaped by the personalities who were involved as much as by philosophical enquiry)

Expanding, re-naming or correcting the categories would be welcome.

Finally, what to do with the left wing literature conservatives should be familiar with (John Rawls' "Theory" or Marx's "Manifesto")?

I figure one post a week on this subject between now and the end of the POTUS race should be sufficient to get a good discussion going.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Under Tyranny should be:

-Darkness At Noon,
-1984
-One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich

Aaron

Anonymous said...

Biographies:
Last summer I got into a habit of reading every Churchill biography. (except his own- too long for an this restless Plebe)

The one striking thing I found, was that many of Churchill's quotes and actions are still viable today in the conservative dialog. Warnings he gave 60 years ago apply today.

-plebe

Anonymous said...

Marx, et al. should be in the "Know your enemy category"

Bogus Doug said...

In retrospect, I'm in big agreement with choosing "Parliament of Whores," as it's P. J.'s best book.

Good idea on the categories, but I'll have to think more on that to offer any useful opinions.

Marty said...

I'm not sure we should put novels under "tyranny" as I was thinking the topic should be focused more on the real history of tyrants. 1984, Animal Farm, and other utopia/dystopias should probably be put under "literature" but I'm open to discussion on that.

Another problem is where to put some of the broad works of conservatism. Kirk's "the Conservative Mind" and Goldwater's "Conscience" aren't immediately nor easily categorized.

Anonymous said...

Its hard to make a case that dystopian literature is conservative on its face. Its certainly anti-totalitarian and anti-communist, but I they aren't works of "Conservative lit."

They define themselves by what they are against, not what they are for.

You might want to make a "Fiction" category and then have sub divisions. That may have what you were trying to get at, but I missed the point.

Aaron

Anonymous said...

Affirmative Action Around the World (Thomas Sowell). This was probably the strongest case i've read against affirmative action. However, it still doesn't make up Sowell's awful baseball columns.

I would either throw it under Education.

Supreme Conflict (Jan Crawford Greenberg). This one is under the law. Its kind of an insiders guide to the last 30 years of the supreme court. Its most interesting chapter is the one on Justice Thomas. She makes a case, backed up by Harry Blackmun's private papers, that Thomas is the one that influences and pulls Scalia to the right.

My Grandfathers Son (Justice Thomas). Under biography.

Free To Choose - Probably under Economics, but it depends what is going on in the liberty category

The case for democracy - liberty section.

Kirk's The Conservative Mind - probably under history since it is a history of the conservative movement. The other option is a political theory category.

Anonymous said...

Touching on the concept of Dystopian Lit brings up some questions with regards to the variences within the conservative movement and the political spectrum as a whole. Orwell was an athiest and a Democratic Socialist, yet conservatives show great affinity for his anti-communist anti-totalitarian viewpoints addressed in books like Animal Farm and 1984. Indeed, orwell even went so far as to turn in lists of prominant literary and entertainment figures he felt were communists. But while orwells works contain elements that can be lauded by conservatives, they also contain problematic concepts, particularly for neo-cons, that the left can stake claim to as well. Take 1984 for example, where the state was propped up by perpetual warfare and a miltary industrial complex, which immitates the neocon positions of interventionalist foriegn policies and anti-isolationism. One might also take notice of the concept of Pre-emption, which can be illiterated in the idea of the "thought police". And while Paleocons can appreciate his warnings against big government (big brother), the Social conservatives beliefs in governments rights to take positions on points of morality don't entirely jive with the main characters arrest for the crime of having sex. But again, being that 1984 was basically a portrait of communism, paleocons and neocons alike have much to appreciate in Orwells work. (We might as well throw in Brave New World while we're at it).